View Article |
Difference among ranking Algorithms of different web search tools: a statistical approach
Isfandyari-Moghaddam, Alireza1, Ranjbar, Vahid2.
One of evaluation studies examining web search tools is ranking algorithm area. Accepting the idea that different search tools do use different ranking algorithms, the present research aims to confirm such an idea using a statistical approach. To do this, five metasearch engines (MSEs) namely Ez2find, Dogpile, MetaCrawler, Info and WebCrawler along with their four common underlying single search engines (SEs) – Google, Yahoo!, Msn (currently called Windows Live Search) and Ask – have been applied. To conduct the research five queries have been utilized. For comparing ranking algorithms of these web search tools, statistical tests Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey HSD were utilized. The findings indicate and confirm that different search tools on the web make use of different ranking algorithms. In other words, this research supports findings of previous studies.
Affiliation:
- Islamic Azad University, Iran
- Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 440 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2019) |
H-Index
|
0 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Web of Science (JCR 2016) |
Impact Factor
|
0.650 |
Rank |
Q3 (Information Science & Library Science) |
Indexed by |
Scopus (SCImago Journal Rankings 2016) |
Impact Factor
|
- |
Rank |
Q2 (Library and Information Sciences) |
Additional Information |
0.399 (SJR) |
Indexed by |
MyAIS (Impact 2010) |
Impact Factor
|
2.02 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Library Literature and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) |
Impact Factor
|
0 |
Rank |
0 |
Additional Information |
SJR 0.439 Cites/Doc.(2years) 0.630 |
|
|
|