View Article |
How students use E-books – reading or referring?
Noorhidawati, A1, Gibb, Forbes2.
This paper reports a study on students perceptions and reactions towards e-books in Higher Education (HE). During this study a Web survey and a follow-up study were conducted using students from University of Strathclyde as a sample population. The Web survey revealed that there were three different types of e-book use in an academic setting: (a) fact finding; (b) finding relevant content; and (c) extended reading. The most popular reason for using e-books was for finding relevant content which indicated that e-books were not read in their entirety but instead were consulted or used for reference purpose. The Web survey finding was then confirmed by the follow-up study. This study is valuable for designing a better e-book features in which they should be designed according to what purpose the e-books are used for (i.e. for reference purpose or extended reading or both). If the e-books are intended to be used for reference purpose, the features might include practical searching and browsing features, whereas if the e-books are designed for extended reading they should be provided with features that are conducive for on-screen reading such as a good layout design and navigation tools.
Affiliation:
- University of Malaya, Malaysia
- University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 422 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2019) |
H-Index
|
0 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Web of Science (JCR 2016) |
Impact Factor
|
0.650 |
Rank |
Q3 (Information Science & Library Science) |
Indexed by |
Scopus (SCImago Journal Rankings 2016) |
Impact Factor
|
- |
Rank |
Q2 (Library and Information Sciences) |
Additional Information |
0.399 (SJR) |
Indexed by |
MyAIS (Impact 2010) |
Impact Factor
|
2.02 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Library Literature and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) |
Impact Factor
|
0 |
Rank |
0 |
Additional Information |
SJR 0.439 Cites/Doc.(2years) 0.630 |
|
|
|